You know, writes David P Griffiths, many years ago in the 1950's or early 60's my mum and dad sent me to a hall in North Lancashire, Capernwray, that has stood for years on the crucifixion of self, so as to be a container of God, his temple so that we give up all to follow him, we become his temple for him to operate through, but today has come in a self pre-eminence Gospel, one that emphasizes ministry to self as in the Valdres prophecy.

​

No longer today will they tolerate sound conviction preaching like I remember my dad giving at Vyrnwy Street Mission Hall in Liverpool by Anfield Football Ground.

​

Instead we have to come under the social policy of the EU, not upset people, not offend people but toplerate all kinds of lifestyles even those of sin but God is not mocked. As we give up our everything so he give our empty vessel all of heaven. Such has been the teaching of Capernwray but our political and legal systems have been taken over by the European Social model, the social mpdel of the Roman Catholic Church exposed here in our intercessions.

​

The coming intercession is to uphold the Capernwray example but first a quote from Daniel Hannan's excellent book - A Doomed Marriage: Britain and Europe; Notting Hill Editions, Chapter 5 - The tyranny of the status quo

​

When preparing the document that became the European Constitution, and then the Lisbon Treaty, the EU authorities made a great show of 'consulting the people.' In 2003, 200 organisations, representing 'civil society' were invited to submit their suggestions on what the draft should contain. Interested in how these 200 bodies had been selected, I put down a written question asking which of them received grants from the EU. After some toing and froing, the answer eventually came back: all of them.

​

Conflict of interest is one that has come against our ministry, there being a hostile group against us from 2010 threatening to 'destroy us through official channels' costing me and my wife personally many thousands of pounds. The base of their legal actions against us are those of European law based on the Jezebel of the EU's social policy rather than Protestant Constitutional Law that the present Monarch is on oath to uphold. Threatening Protestants is very much the underlying law operating in Britain. we discovered the leader of one Government investigation team to be of the same religion as those opposing us, yet no conflict of interest was put forward. This is only used when it suits the Jezebel's own ends.

​

You see how the system works? The EU sets up and funds an interest group. That group duly demands that the EU seizes more powers. The EU then announces that, in response to popular demand, it is extending its jurisdiction.

​

This jurisdiction even included in one case that we were found faultless by a criminal investigation, but in the civil case we were warned by an Islamic barrister not to say a word in court else you would be destroyed but to hand over £9,000. I declared that I do not have £9,000. I am only on DSS Carers Allowance and was told I would have to borrow it. I did and have only paid back £1,600. Today my income has gone up from the £257 Carers Allowance to £657 monthly state pension. This is all my income yet the EU infiltrated political and legal system constantly looks to drain us, those looking to uphold our Protestant Constitution.

​

Virtually every field of activity has some approved, EU sponsored pressure group to campaign for deeper integration: the European Union of Journalists, the European Women's Lobby, the European Cyclists' Federation. These are not independent associations which just happen to be in receipt of EU funds. They are, in most cases, creatures of the European Commission, wholly dependent on Brussels for their existence.

​

As a ministry we have tried gaining media publicity on matters upholding the Constitution, Christian Ethics. It is like hitting a brick wall for if it comes against European Social Policy the Jezebel of control will say 'no!'

​

Nor is the racket limited to pan-European bodies headquartered in Brussels. The EU has been active in subsisiding established NGO's within the nation states too. It starts harmlessly enough, with one off grants for specific projects. After a while, the NGO realises that it is worth investing in a 'European Officer' whose job, in effect, is to secure bigger grants. As the subventions become permanent, more 'Europe Officers' are hired. Soon, the handouts are taken for granted and factored into the organisation's budget. Once this stage is reached, the EU is in a position to call in favours.

​

This is classic Jezebel, luring the victim organisation in through the giving of harmless grants, but the favours demands a control, a control over the political and social policy of that organisation in line with the aims of the EU and not the landmarks of movements. Whole Church organisations, charities that were once Christian have all been taken over by this and if you should challenge this they will try and destroy you, for that is the very nature of the Jezebel.

​

One example will serve to illustrate what I'm talking about. When he introduced the Bill to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in 2007, the then Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, made a great song and dance about the fact that it wasn't just Labour Europhiles who backed the text. A whole range of NGO's, he told the House of Commons, had also come out in favour: 'The NSPCC had pledged its support, as have One World Action, Action Aid and Oxfam,' he said, looking pleased with himself. 'Environmental organisations support the treaty provisions on sustainable development and even the commission of bishops supports the treaty. This is a coalition, not of ideology, but integrity.'

​

Integrity? A few moments on the Internet revealed that every organisation he had cited was in receipt of EU subventions. Most of them, it turned out, had also received grants from the British government. Hardly surprising, then, that they should dutifully endorse a treaty supported by their paymasters.

​

Many today are in receipt of pensions and wages from organisations embracing a foreign ideal contrary to our Constitutional Acts that demand no liaison with foreign powers and influences outside of our own "Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law." Those therefore who have received these benefits, it is interesting to note not only enjoy the material benefits of such grants but fundamentally oppose, often with legal actions and threats of legal actions any who should expose these corruptions.

​

What was surprising was the extent of their financial dependency. When Mr. Milliband sat down, I fired off a written question asking the European Commission how much money it had paid these organisations. It turned out that, in the previous year, Action Aid, the NSPCC, One World Action and Oxfam had among them been given 43,051,542.95.

​

Just think about that sum for a moment. Can organisations in receipt of such colossal subsidies legitimately call themselves 'non-governmental'? Can they claim to be independent? Can they even describes themselves as charities - at least in the sense that we commonly understand the word?

​

Now I have been in the presence of a former British Cabinet Member, a man of integrity and balance who outside the reach of the British Press was quite open of the EU's links it would seem, to a well known gangster organisation with strong links to the Vatican, indeed information has just come into me that a body linked to one of the receiving large charities based in UK actually worked with a banned terrorist organisation in its endeavours in Ireland, a place from where funds and goods from our own Christian business in Inverness had been taken. All this has now come out into the open in intercession putting a whole different light as to how our nation is now run, with no prosecution lists, secret deals and attacking those who uphold the Queen's Oath and promises to the embarrassment of an establishment now controlled by the Deep State of the European Union with a global agenda of population control, the killing of babies and removal of nationhood. Truly it was wrong for Romanist Priests to abuse children in Ireland, but what is more wrong is to bow down to grant giving bodies that are upholding an agenda that destroys life rather than gives it!

​

Why should any of us want to give money to a body that is already forcibly expropriating us through the tax system, and then using part of the revenue to lobby the government?

The other body which Mr. Milliband cited, the 'Commission of Bishops', Conferences of the European Community'. Far from being an episcopal body that just happened to back closer union, it was a Brussels-based outfit whose purpose was 'to promote reflection, based on the ( Roman Catholic) Church's social teaching, on the challenges facing a unite Europe'. In other words, while seeking to give the impression of broad support for a new transfer of powers to Brussels, the British Foreign Secretary was reduced to citing a body whose sole purpose is to interact with European institutions, and which would be out of business if the EU disappeared. The French call the phenomenon 'deformation professionelle': the tendency, perhaps subliminal, to form opinions according to the dictates of your professional self-interest.

​

We live in a country that has it own gathering of Bishops who are constitutionally under oath to uphold the "Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law." What the Labour Government in power did however was uphold a Council of Bishops who were there to uphold an alien religion, one that has controlled and infiltrated our society under threat and social and financial mal-practice. We have exposed this by the Spirit calling our nation back to God hence our following intercession at Capernwray, a place from where the ideals of our early childhood were taught before the social agenda of Europe split our family, split our nation and took over Church movement after Church movement embracing now the cultural Marxism of Romanism and the ideals of a Union our nation never voted in.